- #Participants in a formal discussion use language that is how to
- #Participants in a formal discussion use language that is upgrade
You must put forth your point to the group in a very emphatic, positive and confident manner. ~If you do not change your stand, you are seen as an inflexible, stubborn and obstinate person. ~If you change your stand, you are seen as a fickle-minded or a whimsical person. Some participants tend to get emotionally attached to the topic and take a stand either in favour or against the topic, ie 'Yes, India should', or, 'No, India should not'.īy taking a stand, you have already given your decision without discussing the topic at hand or listening to the views of your team members.Īlso, if you encounter an opposition with a very strong point at the 11th hour, you end up in a typical catch-22 situation: Say the topic of a GD is, 'Should India go to war with Pakistan?' You must be open to other ideas as well as to the evaluation of your ideas: That is what flexibility is all about.īut first, remember: Never ever start your GD with a stand or a conclusion. ~S/he also inspires and motivates team members to express their views.Ĭaution: Being a mere coordinator in a GD does not help, because it is a secondary role.Ĭontribute to the GD with your ideas and opinions, but also try and steer the conversation towards a goal. ~S/he contributes to the GD at regular intervals with valuable insights. ~S/he coordinates the effort of the different team members in the GD. ~S/he shows direction to the group whenever group moves away from the topic. Here, a leader would be someone who facilitates the third situation at a GD.Ī leader would have the following qualities: ~ A GD where participants discuss the topic assertively by touching on all its nuances and try to reach the objective. ~ A GD where participants get emotionally charged and the GD gets chaotic. ~ A GD where participants are unable to establish a proper rapport and do not speak much. There are three types of situations that can arise in a GD:
'With reduction in fees, less money will be available to perform these ,activities which will lead to deterioration in the quality of IIMs.'
#Participants in a formal discussion use language that is upgrade
'Moreover, it costs money to attract good faculty, create good infrastructure and upgrade technology. 'Reduction in IIMs' fees will result in less funds being invested on study material, student exchange programmes, research, student development activities, etc. Reasoning ability plays an important role while expressing your opinions or ideas at a GD.įor example, an opinion like 'Reduction in IIMs' fees will affect quality' can be better stated by demonstrating your reasoning ability and completing the missing links between fees and quality as: Management aspirants who lack team skills cannot be good managers. The reason: Managers always work in teams.Īt the beginning of his career, a manager works as a team member. Here are some of the most important personality traits that a candidate should possess to do well at a GD:ī-Schools lay great emphasis on this parameter because it is essential for managers to be team players. After some time, during which they collect their thoughts, the group is asked to discuss the topic for 20 to 25 minutes.ī-Schools use the GD process to assess a candidate's personality traits. Just reiterating the clich� that a Group discussion, or GD, as it is commonly called, is a group process or a team building exercise does not help students.Īs in a football game, where you play like a team, passing the ball to each team member and aim for a common goal, GD is also based on team work, incorporating views of different team members to reach a common goal.Ī Group Discussion at a B-School can be defined as a formal discussion involving ten to 12 participants in a group.
#Participants in a formal discussion use language that is how to
These questions might seem awkward and absurd when talking about How to crack a Group Discussion to get into a top B-School.īut they are relevant to understand the nuances of a Group Discussion.
0 kommentar(er)
